R01 Authorisation, exemptions and appointed representatives: free practice questions

5 free questions on Authorisation, exemptions and appointed representatives, part of learning outcome 5 (Regulators' approach & the Handbook). Pick an answer to check it, or open the answer to see why each option is right or wrong.

  1. Question 1 of 5

    Under s.19 FSMA, what is the maximum penalty on indictment for breaching the general prohibition?

    Show answer

    The answer is C: Two years' imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine

    Carrying on a regulated activity without being authorised or exempt breaches the general prohibition. On indictment it carries up to two years' imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.

    Why the other options are wrong

    A
    Ten years applies to insider dealing and misleading statements.
    B
    Fourteen years applies to the main POCA money laundering offences.
    D
    The penalty isn't limited to a small fine.
  2. Question 2 of 5

    What is the effect of an 'exclusion' under the regulated activities regime?

    Show answer

    The answer is D: It makes an otherwise regulated activity unregulated

    Exclusions, such as the introducer and overseas persons exclusions, turn otherwise regulated activities into unregulated ones, so a firm relying on one doesn't need authorisation for that activity.

    Why the other options are wrong

    A
    Banning someone is a prohibition order.
    B
    Exclusions aren't about FSCS protection.
    C
    Exclusions don't concern capital requirements.
  3. Question 3 of 5

    Which of these is a designated professional body (DPB)?

    Show answer

    The answer is B: The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors

    DPBs include the three law societies, the four accountancy bodies, the Institute of Actuaries, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and the Council for Licensed Conveyancers.

    Why the other options are wrong

    A
    The CII is a professional body for insurance and financial planning, but not a DPB.
    C
    The FOS resolves complaints; it isn't a DPB.
    D
    The PFS isn't a designated professional body.
  4. Question 4 of 5

    Natalia's portfolio loses 50% in a stock market crash. Is she entitled to compensation from her adviser?

    Show answer

    The answer is A: Only if the advice breached FSMA or FCA rules

    A firm must compensate loss caused by advice that breached the rules, but a fall in value due to market movements doesn't in itself give rise to compensation.

    Why the other options are wrong

    B
    There's no automatic compensation threshold.
    C
    Firms are liable for advice that breaches the rules.
    D
    The FSCS doesn't guarantee investment values.
  5. Question 5 of 5

    An appointed representative wants more than one principal. Which statement is correct?

    Show answer

    The answer is A: Investment ARs can have one principal; insurance ARs any number

    An investment AR can have only one principal. Mortgage ARs can have separate principals for different classes of business, and insurance ARs can have any number. Multiple principals need a multi-principal agreement with a lead principal handling complaints.

    Why the other options are wrong

    B
    It's the other way round: investment ARs are limited to one.
    C
    There's no general limit of three.
    D
    Mortgage ARs can have different principals for different classes, such as equity release.

Practise all 21 Authorisation, exemptions and appointed representatives questions

These are 5 of the 21 questions on this topic in R0 Exam Prep, and the full R01 bank covers every learning outcome. Practise free, track your weak areas and sit timed mocks.

More on Regulators' approach & the Handbook

Every R01 topic

R0 Exam Prep is an independent revision tool. It is not produced, endorsed by or affiliated with the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII). Questions and explanations are original. Use it alongside the official study text. About R0 Exam Prep